Breeding and hunting

Breeding and hunting

Postby Payce » Sat Jan 12, 2019 5:03 pm

Kept the title generic and do hope the following doesn’t offend. After a fairly long life have come to believe we often make decisions that result in “unintended consequences” later on. Just thinking about the dog world and for me, how it relates to hunting. We have seen the historical impact on many breeds how going after one aspect, like conformity, can lead to a breed losing its ability to accomplish its original purpose. Spaniels, Poodles, Irish Setters, and some lines of Labs/Golden’s come to mind. There seems to be another trend developing as well.....breeding to compete in FT and HT games. Tied to a growing number of owners in both dog games that never or rarely hunt and their kennel of dogs is primarily for entering the games. Our local club is full of great people training for the dog games and few hunt ever. There’s a chance that my Chessie retrieved more birds hunting this year than the rest of the club combined and I don’t hunt all that often.

I’m not saying anything is wrong with people doing so. I’m not judging or critizing any breeder working hard to provide a better FT or HT dog. Just wondering where this is leading with our remaining breeds that are still hunting dogs. Earlier while posting on other Chessie issues we also discussed how the coonhound games had really changed and the impact of certain breeds of hounds. Is there a chance that we are heading down a path that could change the abilities of our breed to fulfill its original purpose or at the least reduce its ability to do so?

One last comment. I believe there is no intent to breed away from hunting abilities. Many actually are focused on a better dog for both hunting and games with both complementing each other. In addition the games were set up as a way for us to stay engaged, train and enjoy our dogs off season. Just feel there is an underlying trend developing and 20 years from now we could see some “unintended consequences”. What do the more experience experts on this forum think?
Last edited by Payce on Sat Jan 12, 2019 10:09 pm, edited 1 time in total.
Posts: 123
Joined: Sun Feb 28, 2016 1:45 pm

Re: Breeding and hunting

Postby Tim Carrion » Sat Jan 12, 2019 8:53 pm

Your concern is timely. Preservation of breed function/ breeding for purpose is on the AKC HT/FT Committee agenda for the March meeting. The AKC Mission statement which appears in every rule/regulation manual reads"The AKC is dedicated to upholding the integrity of the Registry, promoting the sport of purebred dogs and breeding for type and FUNCTION."

The purpose of FT/HT for all hunting breeds is to have a method to evaluate and record the function of the breed and enhance their traits for future generations of dogs. We can debate whether or not we have taken retrieving abilities beyond their intended functions and if this is a positive or negative trend but we still need a scale.
The CBR gene pool is small and we do not have much of much a "deep end". In the games you mention we have very few dogs to objectively point to as excellent retrieving stock. In 2018 CBR represented: 0% National Open Qualifiers, 0.6% of National Amat. Qualifiers, 1.4% of Master National Qualifiers and 1.2% of Master Amat. Qualifiers.
To increase the number of dogs that breeders can identify as having the retrieving abilities they would like to perpetuate for hunting and games(it is not an either /or) now and 20 years from now there does need to be changes.

if anyone has any suggestions to better identify, preserve and enhance for future generations lets hear them.

Tim Carrion
Posts: 89
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 2:27 pm

Re: Breeding and hunting

Postby Sharon Potter » Sun Jan 13, 2019 12:47 am

I've always said that the "games" are good....when they are used to sort out the best dogs of a breed. But when the pendulum swings the opposite direction and dogs are being bred just for the "games" and the breed standard is not a consideration, there is a problem. It happens in the show world...dogs are bred to almost cartoonish extremes, because extremes stand out compared to a well rounded and balanced dog....and especially in our breed, a lot of judges really don't know the breed all that well, sometimes the dogs they put up aren't the best representatives in the ring that day.

In the field trial and hunt test world, it's a lot like baseball. If every batter that came to the plate was knocking the ball out of the park, they'd move the fences back. If you look back to some of the early field trials, back when a dual Labrador was possible, even the National was more like a Senior hunt test. Things continue to become more and more technical, which swings the pendulum far from hunting.

Yes, marking is important. And yes, we've all had those birds in real world hunting that have sailed several hundred yards as cripples. The difference is, the dog saw that bird at 25 yards when we shot it and then marked the whole flight out to that 300 yard landing spot. Marking in a hunt test or field trial situation isn't the same as marking in the real world of hunting. Blinds: In hunt tests and field trials they are tests of teamwork and control. In the real world, they are tests of teamwork and instinct.

What we train for in trials and tests...with the gunshots coming from a great distance away and the dogs having to go toward that like telling our dogs to run to the next guy's blind downriver when to where the shot came from.

Instinct takes a distant backseat, which I find sad. In real world hunting, the dog's job is to recover the bird as fast and efficiently as possible, which is sometimes in direct opposition to requirements in some of the games.

I think the change needs to happen in the games...both show and field...and it won't, because of that huge contingent that rarely or never hunts but spends huge amounts of time and money to win ribbons. It has become the end game for many.

Breeding for events rather than breeding for the breed standard (they are not mutually exclusive) is the problem, at least to me. Events should find the best of a breed, as they were originally intended to do. Now, the tail is wagging the dog. ;)

Change the games...the pendulum can swing back to where it should be. But that's not going to happen.
Sharon Potter
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:18 am

Re: Breeding and hunting

Postby Sharon Potter » Sun Jan 13, 2019 4:30 pm

Just a look at the Labrador tells the tale. Yes, the show ring is guilty of rewarding short legged, Rottweiler headed dogs that huff and puff their way around the ring and would die of old age before they caught up with a running pheasant....and the field trial/hunt test world is just as bad, with some small, wiry dogs that have long whippy tails and narrow heads and poor coats with no undercoat. Yes, there are some moderate, middle of the road dogs that do meet the breed standard that do well. Neither side looks seriously at the breed standard...they breed for what will win.

Just for fun, here's a video of the ninth series of the 1957 National Amateur Retriever Championship. The dog running is the famous King Buck. The marks are all at JH distances. Compare to today. ;)
Sharon Potter
Posts: 219
Joined: Mon Jan 11, 2016 3:18 am

Return to Chat

Who is online

Users browsing this forum: FrankMuts and 5 guests